From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Fri Sep 1 08:19:28 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k81EJSjb012879; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:19:28 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k81EJQx3029933 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:19:26 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k81BclFI001534 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 07:38:48 -0400 Received: (from roots-in@localhost) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k81BclMg001533 for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 07:38:47 -0400 Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k81B90FI001407 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 07:09:00 -0400 Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k81DnSku027306 for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 07:49:28 -0600 X-Envelope-From: bjschmidt18@netcommander.com Fri Sep 1 07:49:27 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k81DnRjb027293 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 07:49:27 -0600 Received: from netcommander.com (mail.netcommander.com [24.143.0.46]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k81DnRni025517 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 07:49:27 -0600 Received: from 24.143.0.46 [24.143.0.46] by netcommander.com with ESMTP (SMTPD-9.04) id AA4D06BC; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 09:49:01 -0400 To: Cc: Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:49:01 GMT From: "Betty Schmidt" Old-Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------Boundary-00=_95PMCIB0KX5EQ2HN01JG" Message-Id: <200609010949387.SM05240@24.143.0.46> X-RBL-Warning: MXRATE-ALLOW: "GOOD SENDER" X-RBL-Warning: BADHEADERS: This E-mail was sent from a broken mail client [c004021e]. X-RBL-Warning: DYNHELO: Dynamic HELO found. X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam [c004021e]. X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 13 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10. X-Declude-Sender: bjschmidt18@netcommander.com [24.143.0.46] X-Declude-Spoolname: D3a4d01b600001522.smd X-Declude-Scan: Score [13] at 09:49:21 on 01 Sep 2006 X-Declude-Fail: MXRATE-ALLOW [-3], BADHEADERS [8], DYNHELO [5], SPAMHEADERS [3], WEIGHT10 [10] X-Spam-Score: 4.699 (****) BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,MISSING_SUBJECT,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Subject: [ROOTS-L] --------------Boundary-00=_95PMCIB0KX5EQ2HN01JG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Message: =234Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:41:07 -0700 From: robert martin *=5C*Subject: Territorial landI have a great uncle who = obviously owned land*=5C*in the territory of Nebraska, but I can't find = any*=5C*deeds in his name. I do know he owed back*=5C*taxes in 1865 (ten = years after her arrived).*=5C*Wouldn't he have to register his land even = if*=5C*he lived in the territory. This just doesn't make*=5C*sense. The = back taxes were in his name, but*=5C*later on 1867-his wife sold land to = his brother.*=5C*He outlived his wife by several = years?*=5C*Carol*=5C**=5C**=5C**=5C* The Nebraska State Historical Society or the court house in that area can = likely help you. The BLM records on Nebraska are incomplete. I have three relatives and = none show on the BLM site. I have copies of their homesteads from a book = so they do exist but for some reason the BLM doesn't have the records.= --------------Boundary-00=_95PMCIB0KX5EQ2HN01JG--