From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Thu Oct 12 09:05:47 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k9CF5lYn009749;
	Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:05:47 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k9CF5jTX010990;
	Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:05:45 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k9CCMgFI001808;
	Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:22:42 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k9CCMgMi001807;
	Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:22:42 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k9C7UNFI000699
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 03:30:23 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k9CADG9G029207
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 04:13:16 -0600
X-Envelope-From: mjmgenealogy@gmail.com Thu Oct 12 04:13:16 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k9CADGYn029198
	for <ROOTS-M@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 04:13:16 -0600
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k9CAD8Ya001586
	for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 04:13:15 -0600
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 39so242137ugf
        for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 03:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=gkg6tC7oXc4vdvbQ7TQAIZ5Oytm2FuSF/FrjYj+KvdtdxhAzYyowD0zXZGRpJsVndK1p0WZNr2CGUXt6eMnaAQaTj4RveOP5nDE3yxfTvqW+uI4yIIcTVZKuXVZhr2MS4ishrHoYwKQqUq8LeCwD2pIW7GHFFguKIShGaMHQf9U=
Received: by 10.66.240.12 with SMTP id n12mr2440313ugh;
        Thu, 12 Oct 2006 03:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.67.21.17 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 03:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <520b3e20610120313r3c883b3rd460b33f2d4892f7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:13:07 -0400
From: "MJ Mann" <mjmgenealogy@gmail.com>
To: ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com
Subject: Re: [ROOTS-L] Email - PeoplePC spaminator
In-Reply-To: <519.9961c72.325f60a6@aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <519.9961c72.325f60a6@aol.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com

On 10/12/06, ChristieTrapp@aol.com <ChristieTrapp@aol.com> wrote:
>
> It is annoying, but I suppose if we want to communicate directly with that
> individual, we have to jump through their hoops, or just respond to the list
> every time for anybody and avoid these spam controls!
>
> Christie Trapp


Christie,

I refuse to 'jump through hoops'. Doesn't hurt me, maybe wastes some
of my time, but it's mainly their loss.  If it's a detailed, obscure
response, specific to 'their' request ... why should the list be
cluttered with all of that 'stuff' just because someone is
rude/paranoid about receiving mail?

People who are paranoid or whatever, and insist on having these spam
blockers for their 'regular' email, should get a yahoo or gmail or one
of the other free email addresses that are available and use it
strictly for genealogy postings, etc.

For instance, this gmail address is strictly for my mail lists and
related correspondence.  I have six email addresses, each for a
different purpose. <g>

Just my 2cents,
Maureen