From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Sat May 6 15:21:03 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k46LL3jb026261; Sat, 6 May 2006 15:21:03 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k46LL2lT003076 for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 15:21:02 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k46IlMFI031064 for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 14:47:22 -0400 Received: (from roots-in@localhost) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k46IlMY5031063 for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Sat, 6 May 2006 14:47:22 -0400 Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k46BK4FI030247 for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 07:20:04 -0400 Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k46DrXM8009108 for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Sat, 6 May 2006 07:53:33 -0600 X-Envelope-From: lynne227@aircanopy.net Sat May 6 07:53:32 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k46DrWjb009097 for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 07:53:32 -0600 Received: from barracuda.aircanopy.net (barracuda.aircanopy.net [66.160.208.22]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k46DrSFD004325 for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 07:53:29 -0600 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1146923597-31660-316-0 X-Barracuda-URL: http://barracuda.aircanopy.net:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail.aircanopy.net (unknown [192.168.10.120]) by barracuda.aircanopy.net (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 1AF2214912C for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 08:53:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from LYNNE (unknown [66.160.217.22]) by mail.aircanopy.net (Postfix) with SMTP id CE55117BC9 for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 09:00:05 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <001701c67114$6c2b00c0$6401a8c0@LYNNE> From: "lynne227" To: X-ASG-Orig-Subj: One World Trees Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 08:53:13 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Virus-Scanned: by Aircanopy Spam Firewall at aircanopy.net X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=3.5 KILL_LEVEL=5.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.02, rules version 3.0.12163 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Subject: [ROOTS-L] One World Trees I have often wondered why the original "One World Tree" could not remain just that and "locked" and a copy of it added so that others can add or remove or otherwise change the information. I have seen really thoughtless entries to these trees; i.e. a parent born in 1820 and a child born in 1824 or born even before the parent and other similar ridiculous entries. There is one tree online that is my "brick wall" line. However, the submitter is listed as "contact unknown". In cases where the submitter is unknown due to no update of e-mail address, etc, is there a reason why the name could not be left with the original tree and perhaps the date? Lynne in Texas