From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Sat May 6 01:08:47 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4678ljb017127; Sat, 6 May 2006 01:08:47 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4678jfX009751 for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 01:08:45 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k464Z7FI029009 for ; Sat, 6 May 2006 00:35:07 -0400 Received: (from roots-in@localhost) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k464Z7nv029008 for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Sat, 6 May 2006 00:35:07 -0400 Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k460EmFI028526 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 20:14:48 -0400 Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k462mFov002043 for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Fri, 5 May 2006 20:48:15 -0600 X-Envelope-From: fenenga@connpoint.net Fri May 5 20:48:15 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k462mFjb002034 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 20:48:15 -0600 Received: from email-out.userservices.net (email-out.userservices.net [207.109.251.2]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k462mCNL001217 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 20:48:12 -0600 Received: from your6bvpxyztoq (dialup-ras15-90.eug.or.uspops.net [64.28.51.90]) by email-out.userservices.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id k462lmpB015510 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 19:48:12 -0700 Message-ID: <010801c670b7$765250b0$5a331c40@your6bvpxyztoq> From: "Edwin and Cornelia Moore" To: References: <200605051612.k45GCgBf006485@lists5.rootsweb.com> Subject: RE: [ROOTS-L] Major errors on Ancestry's One Great Tree Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 19:47:47 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com how many hours (make that days...weeks...perhaps months) must I sit and "vote" to have much of my more than 10,000 presently known relatives filed correctly in and by One World Tree? are you crazy? this is an insane concept. I have more time on my hands than many, but not that kind of time. they have butchered my family tree, and now they expect me to make the corrections? literally thousands of them? who's crazy in this scheme, me for wanting my tree to be correctly stored and displayed (this goes for FamilySearch, as well, which also butchered my tree, worse than even One World Tree did), or them for butchering it and then expecting me to correct it? I've already given them more than a piece of my mind regarding this, and all I got for it was a "so sorry, not our problem" type of reply. in many ways they are a boon and a blessing, but in this they failed on every level. it may work for someone who's research holds less than 100 individuals, but those of us who have been researching for 20 years cannot possibly correct all the errors in our files in one world tree. there just isn't enough time....unless that is all one does....and I do mean ALL. voting is NOT the answer. Cornelia