From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Tue May  2 13:34:06 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42JY6jb024479;
	Tue, 2 May 2006 13:34:06 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k42JY4ho022802
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Tue, 2 May 2006 13:34:04 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k42H0dFI010115
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Tue, 2 May 2006 13:00:39 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k42H0dKg010114
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Tue, 2 May 2006 13:00:39 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k42ExaFI009831
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Tue, 2 May 2006 10:59:36 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k42HWoRS015906
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Tue, 2 May 2006 11:32:50 -0600
X-Envelope-From: elizhgene@gmail.com Tue May  2 11:32:50 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k42HWojb015895
	for <ROOTS-M@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Tue, 2 May 2006 11:32:50 -0600
Received: from pproxy.gmail.com (pproxy.gmail.com [64.233.166.177])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k42HWnDm003222
	for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Tue, 2 May 2006 11:32:50 -0600
Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w49so2320312pyg
        for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Tue, 02 May 2006 10:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=ZVopyku8WC54J7ty8dcJlMdZczy++3wcH70rgfv+KIlQo/KPTV2Y2kcNFGOWW0mrDoKfnXq9NivVcc99FtHwZHvuYNuD2sFMuQd+dAVBzlBHmblW92kOKHleHA1cR+GGJ9p9rnAJMCJ6Cqg6MSp74XOd6lqxy2roTr8n6znFP3s=
Received: by 10.35.105.18 with SMTP id h18mr1321391pym;
        Tue, 02 May 2006 10:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.35.64.11 with HTTP; Tue, 2 May 2006 10:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e7cade160605021032l9974900rf7fbb5c4dc935e87@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 13:32:46 -0400
From: "Eliz Hanebury" <elizhgene@gmail.com>
To: "Betty and Herschell Spears" <hebe@peoplescom.net>
Subject: Re: [ROOTS-L] 1890 Federal Census
Cc: ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com
In-Reply-To: <001401c66d6d$85c5e680$21b28043@DF3WJX51>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
References: <001401c66d6d$85c5e680$21b28043@DF3WJX51>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com

If you have a different format do you have the Civil War Veterans return of
1890? some of the 1890 survived the fire and water and bad recordkeeping,
possibly you got one of those <G>
Eliz








On 5/1/06, Betty and Herschell Spears <hebe@peoplescom.net> wrote:
>
> I have been told that the 1890 Federal Census was destroyed by fire.  I
> recently found some of
> my ancestors listed living in Ellis County, Texas, enumerated 16 June
> 1890.
> They used an entirely
> different format but was clear and informative.  You experienced rooters,
> tell me about it.
>
>