From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Mon May  1 10:56:53 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k41Gurjb022738;
	Mon, 1 May 2006 10:56:53 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k41GuqVM004144
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Mon, 1 May 2006 10:56:52 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k41ENUFI030268
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Mon, 1 May 2006 10:23:30 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k41ENUH0030267
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Mon, 1 May 2006 10:23:30 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k41E07FI030143
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Mon, 1 May 2006 10:00:08 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k41GXIDG008012
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Mon, 1 May 2006 10:33:18 -0600
X-Envelope-From: Kith-n-Kin@cox.net Mon May  1 10:33:18 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k41GXIjb008003
	for <ROOTS-M@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Mon, 1 May 2006 10:33:18 -0600
Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (fed1rmmtao09.cox.net [68.230.241.30])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k41GXHIF025323
	for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Mon, 1 May 2006 10:33:18 -0600
Received: from TOWER ([68.0.155.47]) by fed1rmmtao09.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP
          id <20060501163312.JJS24290.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@TOWER>
          for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Mon, 1 May 2006 12:33:12 -0400
From: "Kith-n-Kin" <Kith-n-Kin@cox.net>
To: <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
Subject: RE: [ROOTS-L] To Submit or Not Submit, that is the question.
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 09:33:00 -0700
Message-ID: <000a01c66d3c$ec649d40$6601a8c0@TOWER>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <44557E10.8020108@rochester.rr.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by admin.rootsweb.com id k41GXIjb008003
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com


Well, you got a "yes" and a "no" -- so here's a thought.

I sent a copy of a gedcom to FTM years ago, and the CDs have taken on a life of their own. It has come
back to haunt me. Ever run a search on someone and found yourself listed as the "source" of bad
information?  So, take care, I'd say.

When I have posted family trees, I pick only a small family group, that I have pretty well vetted, and not
too many generations. 

Shirley, I think it was, has many generations, and lots of people, but restricts the possible download of
a gedcom to just a few generations.

It is good to get the information out there, as long as it isn't just something you copied from someone
else's postings, and that you control it in some way.

If there is anything that peeves me, it is finding the same "family" posted identically fifty times on the
family tree sites, with the same source "gedcom #xxxx" as the authoritative source. 

Pat (in Tucson)



