From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Fri Mar 10 21:53:53 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k2B4rrjb000672;
	Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:53:53 -0700
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2B4rpR7029326
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:53:52 -0700
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k2B2NYFI022052
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:23:34 -0500
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k2B2NYsC022051
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:23:34 -0500
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k2B1lOFI021906
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:47:25 -0500
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k2B4HVPo022373
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:17:31 -0700
X-Envelope-From: GenBrd@aol.com Fri Mar 10 21:17:31 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k2B4HVjb022362
	for <ROOTS-L@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:17:31 -0700
Received: from imo-m23.mail.aol.com (imo-m23.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.4])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2B4HU85010867
	for <ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com>; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:17:30 -0700
Received: from GenBrd@aol.com
	by imo-m23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.3.) id e.227.7a8f07b (2168)
	 for <ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com>; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:17:20 -0500 (EST)
From: GenBrd@aol.com
Message-ID: <227.7a8f07b.3143a950@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:17:20 EST
To: ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 2340
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com
Subject: [ROOTS-L] Child born out of wedlock

All families today have to deal with this issue, whether it be in the  past 
or in the present.  As genealogists we have a responsibility to record  things 
as they are.  However, we also must maintain a true sensitivity to  those 
persons that are affected by this event.
 
My father was born to my grandmother when she was 18, the victim of a  
molestation by a relative (not blood thankfully).  As much as she fiercely  loved my 
father, he was also her shame.  She did many things throughout  life to not 
have to face the true fact of his birth and somehow thinking she  could hide it.
When my father was 3 years old my grandmother married the wonderful man  that 
will forever be considered my grandfather.  A man who from that date  said 
"this is my son" to anyone that asked.  
However, we do know the name of my biological grandfather who remained a  
part of the family until his death when I was a small child.  I have vague  
memories of him but had no clue that he was really my grandfather.
 
When I began genealogy my father told me that I could do all the research I  
needed, he would answer my questions and he would help with my searching in 
the  small towns of his childhood, but he asked that I make nothing public until 
 after he was dead.  He said then there would be nobody to be hurt.
So out of respect for him I have followed that request, he died last  
September and I am not sure when I will feel comfortable making things  public.
 
My point is that you need to remember we are talking about people's lives  
and that there are things that may hurt others by being made public.
 
As far as recording that information.  Because my father is not the  only 
"mixed up" relationship in my database that goes back to the 16th century,  I use 
The Master Genealogist.  This program lets you record names and  events 
without limit, and you can explain every detail as much as you wish -  there is no 
space limitation.  I can list my father with both fathers and  include both of 
their family lines.
 
Yes, genetically there is only one line that is genealogically correct,  that 
is the line of my biological grandfather.  
However, genealogy is about people.  And people are about  relationships.  So 
as long as I am not recording simply names and  dates, I must include the man 
who raised my father and whose name was my  own.  Both of those men have 
relationships in  our fmily and they will  both be recorded - but with detailed 
explanation.
 
Jo H

