From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Thu Mar  2 17:19:08 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k230J8jb024659;
	Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:19:08 -0700
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k230Iocs023673
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:18:51 -0700
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k22Ln1FI020622
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:49:01 -0500
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k22Ln1fX020621
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:49:01 -0500
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k22LNmFI020503
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:23:48 -0500
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k22NrQoY000816
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:53:26 -0700
X-Envelope-From: jholly1968@tpk.net Thu Mar  2 16:53:26 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k22NrQjb000807
	for <ROOTS-M@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:53:26 -0700
Received: from troll.tpk.net (troll.tpk.net [216.107.198.11])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k22NrNPi010048
	for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:53:24 -0700
Received: from yourf78bf48ce2 (216-107-192-204.megadial.mnchnh.seg.NET [216.107.192.204])
	by troll.tpk.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id k22Nr1UB001559;
	Thu, 2 Mar 2006 18:53:06 -0500
Message-ID: <005701c63e54$744239b0$ccc06bd8@yourf78bf48ce2>
From: "J. Hollenbeck" <jholly1968@tpk.net>
To: "David Warncken" <d.warncken@bigpond.com>, <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
References: <7.0.1.0.0.20060302214659.01ad2710@bigpond.com>
Subject: Re: [ROOTS-L] Data Entry Convention for Illegitimate Surname
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 18:53:05 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Warncken" <d.warncken@bigpond.com>
To: <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 6:07 AM
Subject: [ROOTS-L] Data Entry Convention for Illegitimate Surname


>I would like to know whether there is a convention for recording the 
>surname of illegitimate children.
>
I don't know what the convention is, but I use whatever surname they used, 
making sure that the father and mother are both recorded under their 
respective names. If there is confusion about it, I put a note down giving 
the other surname as an alternate.

Joyce Hollenbeck 


