From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Wed Jun 14 15:51:20 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5ELpKjb019991; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:51:20 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5ELpJmb030080 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:51:19 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k5EJFKFI018885 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:15:20 -0400 Received: (from roots-in@localhost) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k5EJFK52018884 for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:15:20 -0400 Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k5EFDaFI018373 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:13:36 -0400 Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k5EHnPgi009283 for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:49:25 -0600 X-Envelope-From: 4uswqp602@sneakemail.com Wed Jun 14 11:49:25 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5EHnPjb009274 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:49:25 -0600 Received: from monkey.sneakemail.com (sneakemail.com [38.113.6.61]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k5EHnMXM029411 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:49:22 -0600 Received: (qmail 25901 invoked by uid 501); 14 Jun 2006 17:49:12 -0000 Received: (sneakemail censored 19619-58875 #1); 14 Jun 2006 17:49:11 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:49:08 -0700 To: ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com From: "Bob" <4uswqp602@sneakemail.com> In-Reply-To: <200606141200.k5EC0TCl004449@lists5.rootsweb.com> References: <200606141200.k5EC0TCl004449@lists5.rootsweb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <19619-58875@sneakemail.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Subject: [ROOTS-L] Re: AFN ? ** Reply to message from on Wed, 14 Jun 2006 06:00:29 -0600 > Hello John , I have been working the LDS stuff for many years , never have > I seen the same person with 2 numbers ,there must be something radically > different to get two numbers I have found several people with multiple AFNs. This happens because several people enter their family tree at different times and do not reference the existing AFNs. At one time the FHC was trying to merge the family data tp eliminate this but it only made things worse by merging family lines with the same names but that were not related. -- Robert Blair