From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Tue Jun 13 11:36:44 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5DHaejb009479;
	Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:36:40 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5DHadXe023025
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:36:39 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k5DF0hFI015131
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:00:43 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k5DF0hR9015130
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:00:43 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k5DAMdFI014586
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 06:22:39 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k5DCwO5M028367
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 06:58:24 -0600
X-Envelope-From: dsam@sampubco.com Tue Jun 13 06:58:24 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5DCwOjb028358
	for <ROOTS-L@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 06:58:24 -0600
Received: from sigma.control-access10.com (sigma.control-access10.com [69.57.184.10])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5DCwHka013226
	for <ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 06:58:22 -0600
Received: (qmail 22718 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2006 08:58:03 -0400
Received: from 67-41-162-222.slkc.qwest.net (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (67.41.162.222)
  by sigma.control-access10.com with SMTP; 13 Jun 2006 08:58:03 -0400
Message-ID: <448EB64E.3000805@sampubco.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 06:57:50 -0600
From: W David Samuelsen <dsam@sampubco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roots-L <ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com>
Subject: Re: [ROOTS-L] San Diego TV station seeks to have government censor
 SSDI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com

When Congress enacted the law to make the SSDI public,

the intent was to require the employers, banks, credit reporting 
bureaus, insurance companies and yes even the state vital statistics 
agencies (responsible for birth and death certificates) to check and 
verify the person is really DEAD and the SSN number is verified and 
blocked. Even the birth certificates are supposed to be checked against 
the database to mark them DECEASED.

So far many of companies have NOT done just that as intended by Congress.

The ID thieves knew exact which database to get around and go for the 
living ones.

Very very few cases of the deceased cases, while so much was reported of 
the living (the thieves go after unshredded financial documents 
containing information they need, as their primary target.)

Removal of SSN #s from the SSDI database will NOT work. It has to remain 
online as a big deterrent and to ensure that any records of the deceased 
are noted and blocked.

W. David Samuelsen

