From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Thu Jun  8 14:40:56 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k58Keujb013433;
	Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:40:56 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k58Keugg010823
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:40:56 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k58I5IFI009197
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:05:18 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k58I5IlG009196
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:05:18 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k58Gp0FI009003
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:51:00 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k58JQSEV009418
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:26:28 -0600
X-Envelope-From: sherrieinfla@earthlink.net Thu Jun  8 13:26:28 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k58JQSjb009409
	for <ROOTS-M@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:26:28 -0600
Received: from pop-satin.atl.sa.earthlink.net (pop-satin.atl.sa.earthlink.net [207.69.195.63])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k58JQONu028958
	for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:26:25 -0600
Received: from dialup-4.238.31.20.dial1.orlando1.level3.net ([4.238.31.20] helo=ssell)
	by pop-satin.atl.sa.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #10)
	id 1FoQ6S-0002VE-00; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:23:36 -0400
Message-ID: <000e01c68b32$2dd446f0$141fee04@ssell>
From: "Sherrie Sell" <sherrieinfla@earthlink.net>
To: <ChristieTrapp@aol.com>, <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
References: <4bd.beaeb7.31b9c47d@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [ROOTS-L] Alvie Davidson - Missouri Death Cert Question
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 15:31:40 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com

I just received from MO State Archives a death certificate on a gg uncle.
The certificate is VERY complete, including name of parents, birth origin,
occupation, cause of death etc.  I paid the $2 and received the copy within
4 weeks.

Sherrieinfla
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ChristieTrapp@aol.com>
To: <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 2:20 PM
Subject: [ROOTS-L] Alvie Davidson - Missouri Death Cert Question


> Alvie:
>
> You mentioned you got the extracted record rather than the full  record.
Did
> you order this directly from the county in question or from  the State
> Archives and pay the $2 fee?  How long did it take you to receive  it once
you
> mailed it to them?
>
> I ask because I sent to the Missouri State Archives for 2 death certs back
> on April 19 and have not received them, nor have they cashed the check as
of
> the  end of May.
>
> As to not naming parents, have you thought about the fact that perhaps the
> parents names weren't listed?  I review the microfilms for the records
from
> Michigan (Oakland and Lapeer Counties, specifically), and sometimes the
parents
> names are not listed in the record.  The names are either left blank or
the
> word "unknown" is written in the space where the parents names are given.
> Without this information, it is a roadblock, but sometimes the names can
be
> gotten round the back door by going through the census records.  Of
course,  this
> won't work if you are back to the 1840s for the parent's deaths.  But  in
> most cases this will work.  Deaths in Michigan don't get recorded in  most
all
> counties until 1867 and some of the early entries leave much to be
desired.
>
> What's the case in Missouri?  I've not done much research in that  state
so
> am in the dark at this point about  record availability.
>
> Christie Trapp
>
>
>
>


