From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Tue Jun  6 20:36:00 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k572a0jb015780;
	Tue, 6 Jun 2006 20:36:00 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k572Zw2R015239
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 20:35:58 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k5700SFI002525
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 20:00:28 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k5700SKD002524
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 20:00:28 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k56MRGFI002318
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 18:27:16 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k5712bbw002801
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:02:37 -0600
X-Envelope-From: elizhgene@gmail.com Tue Jun  6 19:02:37 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k5712bjb002790
	for <ROOTS-M@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:02:37 -0600
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5712HwD006980
	for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:02:18 -0600
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m51so62490pye
        for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=WxJAxUGq7mL/yJgFoAO53HYDPMzfZXnOMyvsPCN5zrAhxt1D2UwLeiQTbjcsbqg9ADO6GRh6ZvgfbsNHCIsGdmO5wmtQqSzkwgR/95kBkVJ9I4qQugkvZM55UV982itJLg4MCrq+hMwkBUH53NKOmltSWlrx4WG1qI/4b6Q9Xls=
Received: by 10.35.99.14 with SMTP id b14mr192242pym;
        Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.35.52.20 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 18:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e7cade160606061802l2780e56cndf63f3534c9ace35@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 21:02:18 -0400
From: "Eliz Hanebury" <elizhgene@gmail.com>
To: "rchooverjr@comcast.net" <rchooverjr@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [ROOTS-L] Slave Trade after 1808
Cc: ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com
In-Reply-To: <060620061809.15068.4485C4E7000C2BD800003ADC22007610649D069D0A900101080C9D@comcast.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
References: <060620061809.15068.4485C4E7000C2BD800003ADC22007610649D069D0A900101080C9D@comcast.net>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com

How about slaves already owned? I see a loophole the size of, well, Africa
with this one. Trade to the Barbados was huge in New England. Slaves already
in the country were allowed to be sold so I can see how it could be done.
I would love more clarity on the issue.


Eliz

On 6/6/06, rchooverjr@comcast.net <rchooverjr@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Carol,
> To the best of my knowledge, and from what I have ready / studied on the
> WBTS/ACW Yahoo groups is that, although illegal, there was a very little,
> but still occurring, importation of slaves.  So it is very unlikely, but
> slightly possible, that she came frrom Africa.
>
>