From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Mon Jul 31 07:44:55 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6VDitjb026749;
	Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:44:55 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6VDirPl032084
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:44:53 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k6VB5lFI029195
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:05:47 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k6VB5ljD029194
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:05:47 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k6V8DDFI028800
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 04:13:13 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k6VAplgG028185
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 04:51:47 -0600
X-Envelope-From: justrootin@gmail.com Mon Jul 31 04:51:47 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6VApljb028176
	for <ROOTS-M@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 04:51:47 -0600
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.235])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6VApgAh002431
	for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 04:51:43 -0600
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i31so397315wra
        for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:to:references:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole:from;
        b=ll8KitPnGpDUTBCsHw1p/ffoshf5tdHYYQaPdhtmIFPY9DtzE2xuoYbqegNXhS40q9RN6iwchX6byUSDeeWfs77LAnUXfWhncDPjwl7JQvg9tyBCUUTnB/h35gSmEWCG2iCp9WKrUwU+K/M5CyHwVFfWYvRrWtLfDrD24UHrCVM=
Received: by 10.54.114.3 with SMTP id m3mr2246384wrc;
        Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUZY ( [66.61.159.41])
        by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 7sm3976757wrh.2006.07.31.03.51.39;
        Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <003201c6b48f$4bf8aff0$299f3d42@SUZY>
To: "MScheffler" <mscheffl@twcny.rr.com>, <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
References: <000a01c6b380$c42431d0$87b9e645@Colleen> <ff05fb6e0607300550u6a573e19q225e3e2ffd4a42a@mail.gmail.com> <00f601c6b448$a33089b0$6501a8c0@m1070n>
Subject: Re: [ROOTS-L] Ancestry "New Look"
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 06:51:25 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
From: Suzy McGrew Krol <justrootin@gmail.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com

Hi Margaret,

I didn't realize you could advise them of corrections on census 
reports...how would you go about doing that?

Suzy

P.S. Your research tips have been SO very helpful!

~~~May your journey be as exciting as your destination...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "MScheffler" <mscheffl@twcny.rr.com>
To: <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: [ROOTS-L] Ancestry "New Look"


>    I have been searching a lot of census records the past few weeks and 
> don't see a lot of difference between the old and new thus far.  I do find 
> having access to Ancestry census at home has been a tremendous asset to my 
> research.
>
>    One thing I continue to notice is that where/when I compare families 
> from census year to census year there are quite a few indexing errors. 
> Some of these are transcription errors and some seem to be the spelling of 
> the census taker.
>
>    I have tried where I am reasonably sure of the correct spellings, to 
> send in corrections.  If we all try to do this consistently, it WILL be a 
> help to our fellow researchers.  While it is great to find a family in one 
> census, it certainly ismore helpful to find them in several to get a feel 
> for accuracy and find children born in later decades.
>
>    Ancestry has made it easy to send in corrections.  Now it is up to us 
> to help correct errors.  Some of these are simply matters of 
> interpretation, but we all gain if alternate spellings are offered.
>
> Margaret Scheffler
> 

