From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Sun Jul 30 09:47:11 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6UFlBjb026233;
	Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:47:11 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6UFl9C4020134
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:47:09 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k6UD8RFI025448
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:08:27 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k6UD8RB4025447
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:08:27 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k6UBHQFI025210
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 07:17:26 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k6UDtvMe032649
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 07:55:57 -0600
X-Envelope-From: martinfamilytree@gmail.com Sun Jul 30 07:55:57 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6UDtvjb032638
	for <ROOTS-M@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 07:55:57 -0600
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6UDtsWI017792
	for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 07:55:55 -0600
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x66so349688pye
        for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 06:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=CDhmwS9XM+VRm4EyP7Ml3mFlQ7Mk/nJ14xfMtYqKJIccrdQU+0tXDqRyAW1otTVuOwNyXr966a3xxTRcytUyR+YwOzeJMzBx+6hNNiGAr1J+QoUYfvLBpCY0VwiS5x9U/vrQCksEVcr7yv6Il5D1GTgspLbA2IOCeZruimS9/LA=
Received: by 10.35.41.14 with SMTP id t14mr2312528pyj;
        Sun, 30 Jul 2006 05:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.35.93.6 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 05:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <ff05fb6e0607300550u6a573e19q225e3e2ffd4a42a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 07:50:04 -0500
From: "ctm 007" <martinfamilytree@gmail.com>
To: "Colleen Graham" <ctg3@prodigy.net>
Subject: Re: [ROOTS-L] Ancestry "New Look"
Cc: ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com
In-Reply-To: <000a01c6b380$c42431d0$87b9e645@Colleen>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
References: <000a01c6b380$c42431d0$87b9e645@Colleen>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com

Hi Colleen,

This is not a flame, but I only want to say that I had very good results
using Ancestry.com this morning.  The website must have done something to
improve the search capability because just a few weeks ago I got no hits
using exact spelling of my dad's full name and today the same search results
in hits on the 3 children dad had by his 2nd wife.   I am truly impressed.

Carl


On 7/29/06, Colleen Graham <ctg3@prodigy.net> wrote:
>
> As far as I am concerned, the new look is a complete disaster.  I don't
> think I am the only one who is extremely upset about this.  I have invested
> a lot of time and lots of $$ in Ancestry.  You can't even view my family
> tree anymore.  I tried a sample search of census records for someone, it
> came up with zero hits.  This is a mess, and I don't know how to handle
> it.  Help!!!
>
> Colleen, Reseda CA
>
>