From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Fri Jul 28 21:47:44 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6T3lijb016352; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:47:44 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6T3lgJM008597 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:47:42 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k6T195FI005231 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:09:05 -0400 Received: (from roots-in@localhost) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k6T195OV005230 for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:09:05 -0400 Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k6SLNwFI004769 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:23:58 -0400 Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k6T02Oor002622 for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:02:24 -0600 X-Envelope-From: sdepuy@mhcable.com Fri Jul 28 18:02:24 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6T02Ojb002589 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:02:24 -0600 Received: from smtp-gw.mhcable.com (smtp-gw.mhcable.com [24.105.198.42]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6T02IX3024960 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:02:20 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deliver.mhcable.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C6CE71F8 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:02:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp-gw.mhcable.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (VaMailArmor-2.0.1.16) id 31597-104E0630; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:02:17 -0400 Received: from spartand (24-105-206-167.cm.mhcable.com [24.105.206.167]) by outgoing2.mhcable.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B7D3E71F8 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:02:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <008901c6b2a2$436b2820$6901a8c0@spartand> From: "Sharon De Puy" To: References: <200607280931.k6S9VjPS007219@lists5.rootsweb.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:02:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.1.16; VAE: 6.28.0.18; VDF: 6.28.0.106; host: smtp.mhcable.com) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Subject: [ROOTS-L] Ancestry's new look I also do not like the new look and the results obtained. I used to be able to select either an exact search or a soundex search, but not it seems I automatically get a soundex search. Also, the old format used to tell me how many matches I got and this one doesn't so I don't have a clue how much futile searching I may have to do. The only positive aspect I can see to the new search results is that it does seem to put first the names that either exactly or most closely match what I searched for. I'd really rather they went back to the former format. Sharon in NY X-Message: #9 > Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:38:10 -0700 > From: "Vicky Drake" > Subject: Ancestry's new home page > > Am I just being inflexible and resistant to changes or are others out > there having more difficulty and less success finding their ancestors with > Ancestry's new home page? > > Vicky Drake > dvicky@cox.net > > ------------------------------ >