From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Sun Jul 23 21:38:45 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6O3cjjb000398;
	Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:38:45 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6O3cgqV026113
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:38:42 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k6O10OFI012416
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:00:24 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k6O10OCw012415
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:00:24 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k6NHaJFI011613
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:36:19 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k6NKEQYR017353
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:14:26 -0600
X-Envelope-From: sue.nyc@att.net Sun Jul 23 14:14:26 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6NKEQjb017344
	for <ROOTS-M@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:14:26 -0600
Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.116])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6NKENYd024528
	for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:14:23 -0600
Received: from host (184.new-york-31rh15rt.ny.dial-access.att.net[12.75.173.184])
          by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with SMTP
          id <20060723201418112005e55qe>; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:14:18 +0000
Message-ID: <026101c6ae94$55759580$b8ad4b0c@host>
From: "SueNY" <sue.nyc@att.net>
To: <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
References: <58f.f9ae15.31f4fac7@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [ROOTS-L] Re: Subject used in post not used on list 
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:12:30 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com
X-Spam-Score: 1.01 (*) BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PSBL

Exactly. It happens because some people are too lazy to change the subject
line to reflect what their post is about. Even worse are the ones too lazy
to put anything in the subject line! Anything that comes through with a
blank subject line ""No Subject" or "Undentified Subject!" is pretty much
ignored by most people.

Sue
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <LCFrancis@aol.com>
To: <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 12:16 PM
Subject: [ROOTS-L] Re: Subject used in post not used on list


>
> That replacement subject line can also occur when the writer hits "Reply"
> for their message, but fails to change the subject line. That will
generate the
> subject line of the ROOTS-L mail from where it originated. Therefore one
> should always check their outgoing message, not only for accuracy of their
own
> message, but also to ensure that the subject matter is what they mean to
say.
>
> Lee Francis
> Des Plaines, IL
>
> In a message dated 7/22/2006 11:54:49 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> bhurst3@tampabay.rr.com writes:
>
> I  noticed when my query was posted, the subject line, "Alabama children's
> Homes"  was replaced with " Subject: Re: ROOTS-L Digest V06 #304".  Don't
know
> how this happens but could solve the mystery as to how so many are coming
to
> you incorrectly.  The title of this post is: "Subject used in post not
used
> on list".
>
> Realizing the importance of the subject line, it is mere  stupidity to use
> the receiver's name in this area rather than the topic being  queried.

