From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Sun Jul 23 07:43:10 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6NDh7jb005021;
	Sun, 23 Jul 2006 07:43:07 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6NDh4ot032231
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 07:43:04 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k6NB4lFI008729
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 07:04:47 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k6NB4lq4008728
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 07:04:47 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k6N7BrFI026019
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:53 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k6N9nxR2022073
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:49:59 -0600
X-Envelope-From: almb@sw.rr.com Sun Jul 23 03:49:59 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6N9nxjb022064
	for <ROOTS-L@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:49:59 -0600
Received: from ms-smtp-05.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-05.texas.rr.com [24.93.47.44])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6N9nsA7010204
	for <ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com>; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:49:56 -0600
Received: from sw.rr.com (cpe-68-206-189-204.sw.res.rr.com [68.206.189.204])
	by ms-smtp-05.texas.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6N9nrjQ000499
	for <ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com>; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 04:49:54 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <44C34584.60604@sw.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 04:46:44 -0500
From: Margaret Miller <almb@sw.rr.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com
Subject: [ROOTS-L] RE: AWT, OWT, Ancestry.com 

Thanks for the explanatio, Pat. This is a keeper.

As for giving a smilie to a "good" tree might be a good idea; however, I 
haven't found a single one in any of my lineages that isn't full of 
errors. Too many have copied bad information and passed it on, failing 
to do their own research or, at least, to verify/attempt to verify what 
they see. The "bad" data is going to remain until people at least verify 
what's there. Verify and collect the documentation for the necessary 
corrections. At least what you have will be as nearly correct as is 
possible considering the lack of sufficient references, especially for 
the earlier ancestors. Not only Sherman but also time has done us no 
favor in this respect.

mbm

