From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Wed Jul 19 19:35:28 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6K1ZSjb014663; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:35:28 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6K1ZPqt021572 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:35:25 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k6JMvKFI014045 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:57:20 -0400 Received: (from roots-in@localhost) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k6JMvK22014044 for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:57:20 -0400 Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k6JLWaFI013802 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:32:36 -0400 Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k6K0AUuI006951 for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:10:30 -0600 X-Envelope-From: JYoung6180@aol.com Wed Jul 19 18:10:30 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6K0AUjb006940 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:10:30 -0600 Received: from imo-d21.mx.aol.com (imo-d21.mx.aol.com [205.188.144.207]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6K0A4js003466 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:10:05 -0600 Received: from JYoung6180@aol.com by imo-d21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.5.) id e.392.80bf959 (42807) for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:09:59 -0400 (EDT) From: JYoung6180@aol.com Message-ID: <392.80bf959.31f023d7@aol.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:09:59 EDT To: ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5026 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Subject: [ROOTS-L] Re: Ancestry World Tree Project Surprise From: AMADAN1960@aol.com I do believe, if all of you would read the original message again, you will find that they copied her personal notes, etc. Therefore, if it contains one personal note, the whole article is a copyright. For those who think they know the laws of copyrights, I suggest you read up on it. Jane ---- Jane- I don't know where you got the idea that if an article includes one personal note that extends copyright protection to the whole article--but there is no basis at all for that statement in copyright law. ONLY the personally created original content is copyrightable. You cannot extend your copyright to anything you didn't create. Joan