From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Wed Jul 19 03:53:39 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6J9rdjb025398;
	Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:53:39 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6J9raEp008581
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:53:36 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k6J7FYFI009728
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:15:34 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k6J7FY9J009727
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:15:34 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k6J3jJFI009327
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:45:19 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k6J6N9QM023025
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:23:09 -0600
X-Envelope-From: mscheffl@twcny.rr.com Wed Jul 19 00:23:09 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6J6N9jb023016
	for <ROOTS-M@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:23:09 -0600
Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.56])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6J6N7Aw030618
	for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:23:07 -0600
Received: from m1070n (cpe-69-201-76-92.twcny.res.rr.com [69.201.76.92])
	by ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6J6N42Y020112;
	Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:23:06 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <02ea01c6aafb$c87a0170$6501a8c0@m1070n>
From: "MScheffler" <mscheffl@twcny.rr.com>
To: "Pat Stansbury" <pals@c2i2.com>, <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
References: <001301c6aae1$b751e940$02000003@oemcomputer>
Subject: Re: [ROOTS-L] Ancestry World tree project surprise!
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:22:59 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com

    I cannot answer in detail, but when Ancestry was beginning the One World 
Tree program, they wrote to people about having their information  which was 
in the Ancestry shared database included.  If your information was included 
without your having denied permission for your information, then you must 
have shared your files with someone else who submitted your material.

    I happen to believe that when we share online well researched material, 
we all benefit.  On several occasions people have written to me offering 
material that I would never have received unless I had first shared a 
database online.

    So, the bottom line is -- if you did not share your database with 
Ancestry or WorldConnect in gedcom format, then someone you sent your gedcom 
material to did so.  The material did not get to an online shared database 
without someone submitting it.

    I personally find the WorldConnect database and its equivalent on 
Ancestry of more value than the One World Tree material.  But that is my 
opinion.  I do like Ancestry in general, and for one who cannot spend hours 
in a library or traveling to do onsite research at this point in time, 
Ancestry is a wonderful asset to my own research .

    The bottom line is that if  you do not want your information to show up 
online. DO NOT share it with anyone.  Once any one of us send off a gedcom 
file to ANYONE , it is no longer in our control.  I personally made some 
mistakes in one of my direct lines, and eventually found the mistakes 
included in a Kindred Konnections database that a third party downloaded 
from Ancestry and submitted there.

    Personally I believe sharing is preferred over not doing so, provided 
the people who share make an effort to be accurate and share sources.   Is 
any service perfect?  No.  No one stole anyone's database from an 
individual's computer.  It required someone purposefully submitting it.  If 
one does not want to see their information in an online database, then share 
it with no one.  But this is an endeavor where we need help from others....

Margaret Scheffler


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pat Stansbury" <pals@c2i2.com>
To: <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:15 AM
Subject: [ROOTS-L] Ancestry World tree project surprise!


> Can anyone tell me how does the Ancestry World tree project get your 
> family
> files ? I was shocked to see that ALL my research and notes, public &
> private about my family are on Ancestry World Tree on the internet for
> everyone to see. Much of my notes were for private family information 
> only.
> I can't believe this, as I never sent in that information. Also, is there 
> a
> way to have it taken off ? Has anyone else had a problem like this? How 
> can
> they just get our hard earned research without our permission and then 
> make
> a profit by it ? All the genealogists including myself, share their 
> research
> gladly with others, but to have it taken without permission, and displayed
> only to paying customers is an outrage. I'd like to hear from others with
> the same opinion.
> Pat in AZ
>
>
> 


