From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Wed Jul 12 21:00:32 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6D30Wjb031765;
	Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:00:32 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6D30Su7016035
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:00:28 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k6D0MnFI001133
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:22:49 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k6D0Mnv4001132
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:22:49 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k6CKTBFI000645
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:29:11 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k6CN6eNG030583
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:06:40 -0600
X-Envelope-From: mscheffl@twcny.rr.com Wed Jul 12 17:06:40 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k6CN6ejb030574
	for <ROOTS-M@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:06:40 -0600
Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.57])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6CN6ZKA017767
	for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:06:35 -0600
Received: from m1070n (cpe-69-201-76-92.twcny.res.rr.com [69.201.76.92])
	by ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6CN6VqM023435;
	Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:06:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <051001c6a607$d08b2680$6501a8c0@m1070n>
From: "MScheffler" <mscheffl@twcny.rr.com>
To: "Gloria Jewell" <gajewell@metrocast.net>, <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
References: <000a01c6a5fe$60e93410$1a02a8c0@DDY2JY91>
Subject: Re: [ROOTS-L] Old county assignments vs current
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:06:31 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com

    You might want to check out http://www.goldbug.com/  for the AniMap 
program which is a program telling how the various US counties changed over 
time.

Margaret Scheffler

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gloria Jewell" <gajewell@metrocast.net>
To: <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 5:58 PM
Subject: [ROOTS-L] Old county assignments vs current


>I have been using FTM 2006 for some time. However, I tried Legacy and found 
>many features that I preferred. For instance, when entering a place in 
>Legacy for a person with an old date i.e. 1650, if I use the current county 
>name, Legacy comes back with a message stating that county did not exist 
>during the life of said person.
> I would like to find a website where one could look up these old counties 
> compared to new names.
> Does anyone know of such a sight?
> Thanks
> Gloria Jewell
> 


