From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Thu Jul  6 21:37:19 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k673bJjb028680;
	Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:37:19 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k673bG3p031058
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:37:16 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k670xtFI027999
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:59:55 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k670xtSQ027998
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:59:55 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k670uvFI027924
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:56:57 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k673Y4wn028405
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:34:04 -0600
X-Envelope-From: jaleks@galaxycable.net Thu Jul  6 21:34:04 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k673Y4jb028396
	for <ROOTS-L@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:34:04 -0600
Received: from intertech.net (10b539c357a8b0b322af34fba5b83dec@Aluminium.intertech.net [24.223.0.13])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k673Xtpd024863
	for <ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:33:57 -0600
Received: (qmail 26484 invoked by uid 1021); 7 Jul 2006 03:33:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (jaleks@galaxycable.net@67.63.85.151)
  by intertech.net with SMTP; 7 Jul 2006 03:33:51 -0000
Message-ID: <44ADD617.9080703@galaxycable.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:33:43 -0500
From: Jim <jaleks@galaxycable.net>
Reply-To: jaleks@galaxycable.net
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com
References: <200607070223.k672NZWB026749@lists5.rootsweb.com>
In-Reply-To: <200607070223.k672NZWB026749@lists5.rootsweb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com
Subject: [ROOTS-L] Re: ROOTS-L Digest V06 #278

  I have also taken both of these

pictures to a studio and they were unable to

  tell me any time frame,....

  Thanks,
  Judy Evans-Helton


Judy, I know early 1900 photos used glass plates as "film". They
did so by coating the glass with the silver nitrate (I think that
is right)solution that later was put on plastic(read celluloid) and
called film.  However, it would be almost impossible to determine
when they were printed without some form of forensic analysis.
Even today some people "experiment" and try to make old picture "tin
types". A good museum of art might be able to date them for you
or perhaps Eastman Kodak could, if they would.

Respectfully,
Jim Alexander

