From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Thu Jan 19 11:21:35 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k0JILZRc010549;
	Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:21:35 -0700
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0JIL8nT010189
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:21:08 -0700
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0JFrnFI006637
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:53:49 -0500
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k0JFrn7J006636
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:53:49 -0500
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0JFgkFI006566
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:42:46 -0500
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k0JI9t6a006385
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:09:55 -0700
X-Envelope-From: GenBrd@aol.com Thu Jan 19 11:09:55 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k0JI9tRc006367
	for <ROOTS-L@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:09:55 -0700
Received: from imo-m25.mx.aol.com (imo-m25.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.6])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0JI9nwS002406
	for <ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:09:54 -0700
Received: from GenBrd@aol.com
	by imo-m25.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r6.3.) id e.1f2.198ac3b4 (3310)
	 for <ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:09:30 -0500 (EST)
From: GenBrd@aol.com
Message-ID: <1f2.198ac3b4.31012fda@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:09:30 EST
To: ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5022
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com
Subject: [ROOTS-L] RE:Brick wall - help needed, please! 

 
RUSTAD, Minnesota is in Clay County, about 3 miles from the North Dakota  
border.  
Just a side note of history...The county was established in 1858 and  
originally named Breckenridge County for the then Vice President John  Breckenridge.  
However, after his term in office, he joined the army of the  South in the 
Civil War and the county was promptly renamed Clay County after  Henry Clay.
 
There were very few people in Minnesota in 1835, but the area near Rustad  
was populated by those who ran the Red River carts from St Paul,  carrying goods 
traded from and to the Hudson Bay Company. However, most of  the people who 
ran the Red River carts were called Metis, descendants of  the fur traders and 
the Native Americans of the region.
There would basically be no record of  the names of the residents of  this 
area, there was no census prior to 1857 as far as I know.
     
Minnesota didn't become a state until 1858 and even then, the territorial  
census used to determine there were enough people to make statehood was full of  
alot of imaginary people.  
For a good chuckle, look at the 1857 territorial census rolls sometime if  
you are bored.
 
Bottom line - you may be able to find descendents in the area on the 1857  
territorial census but you would not find the individual you are specifically  
looking for recorded.
 
Jo
 
 
In a message dated 1/18/2006 5:00:55 PM Central Standard Time,  
ROOTS-L-request@rootsweb.com writes:

I went  through an old box with eg old letters and found one from my 
ggggfather's  brother UNO ROBERT HALLGREN to another of my ggggfather's 
brothers. The  letter is dated OCTOBER 13, 1835 in RUSTAD, Minnesota. Other 
information I  have is that he is supposed to have been born in 1812 and died 
in 1844. I  found a notice that said he was a pharmacist/drugstore manager 
(don't know  which word is being used in English), perhaps in N Y.


 

