From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Wed Jan 18 22:39:13 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.16.34])
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k0J5dDSK008441;
	Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:39:13 -0700
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0J5dAjb024374
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:39:10 -0700
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0J3BsFI004406
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:11:54 -0500
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k0J3Bs0j004405
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:11:54 -0500
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.18.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0J2vTFI004326
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:57:29 -0500
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k0J5OZeg002568
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:24:35 -0700
X-Envelope-From: whitleys@ptd.net Wed Jan 18 22:24:35 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.16.34])
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k0J5OZSK002559
	for <ROOTS-M@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:24:35 -0700
Received: from smtpg.ha-net.ptd.net (smtpg.ha-net.ptd.net [207.44.96.87])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0J5OUZN014091
	for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:24:31 -0700
Received: (qmail 7927 invoked by uid 50005); 19 Jan 2006 05:21:43 -0000
Received: from whitleys@ptd.net by smtpg.ha-net.ptd.net by uid 50002 with qmail-scanner-1.20 
 (uvscan: v4.4.00/v4674. spamassassin: 2.60.  Clear:RC:1(24.152.207.123):. 
 Processed in 0.049712 secs); 19 Jan 2006 05:21:43 -0000
Received: from 24.152.207.123.res-cmts.eph.ptd.net (HELO FredsDesktop) ([24.152.207.123])
          (envelope-sender <whitleys@ptd.net>)
          by smtpg.ha-net.ptd.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <doyled@connectnc.net>; 19 Jan 2006 05:21:43 -0000
From: "Frederick H. Whitley" <whitleys@ptd.net>
To: "Dudley Vernon Doyle" <doyled@connectnc.net>, <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
Cc: "Fred Whitley" <whitleys@ptd.net>, "Harry Brown" <h.e.brown@verizon.net>,
   "John Herman" <theherm99@yahoo.com>, "Harlan Boyer" <hboyer678@cs.com>
Subject: RE: [ROOTS-L] Serial Numbers and the"Old Army"
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:24:27 -0500
Message-ID: <DCECLCICLGLKKHAOBNHFMEOHGGAA.whitleys@ptd.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
In-Reply-To: <000b01c61b2b$47386620$0a00a8c0@yourze8cxvr8tt>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.16.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.16.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com

Dudley,  Very interesting.  Point of interest (to me!), my Dad's serial
number was 36,000,000 !!Stay well.   Fred in PA

-----Original Message-----
From: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com
[mailto:roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com]On Behalf Of Dudley Vernon Doyle
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 12:59 AM
To: ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com
Subject: [ROOTS-L] Serial Numbers and the"Old Army"


I am a veteran of WW II , Korea and Vietnam among other  places.
I did wear "Brown Shoes" and also what in those days was called a "Sam
Brown Belt".  The "Brown Shoes" were not brown boots, but were worn with
canvas laced leggings!  Before WWII there were no Paratrooper Boots or
Tanker Boots! Only the "brown shoes" (that came up above the ankles).  In
the field and in "dress formations" these brown shoes were worn with laced
leggings (went up to just below the knee).  This was worn by all Infantry
troops and others except for The Calvary, which had leather leggings.  As
for the serial numbering system, it goes something like this:  Before and
at the beginning of WWII, in the Congenital United States, there were 6
Army Areas Or "Armies".  The First US Army was in the Northeastern United
States and the Sixth US Army was in the far Western States.  During WWII
only the Second US Army and the Fourth US Army remained in the congenital
United States.  The other US Army's , The 1st, 3rd, 5th and 6th all went
overseas. And the 7th and 8th Armies were formed  and went overseas as
well as some units called Army Groups were formed (10th, 11th and 12th).
The Navy also had in the United States what was called Naval Districts.  I
am not that familiar with the Naval districts to discuss that.  Now we get
down to where or what the "Serial Numbers" were based or derived from!
Also within the Congenital United States as well as there being  Army
Areas ( Armies 1 thru 6) there were 9 Corps Areas and this is what the
Serial number was derived from.  (A note: the serial number has nothing to
do with the date of birth!) As has been said by many of you the first
number of the serial number did and still denotes the source of the
military member.  And as many of you have said the "1" represents that the
military member was a volunteer! (This can be somewhat misleading, because
if  you first or originally "volunteered" the member will always carry the
same serial number and it will always begin with the "1" or whatever their
original "source" was.  And by the same thing , if the person was drafted
it will always be a "3" at the beginning of the serial number.)  Also
someone wrote that only the Army had draftees during WWII!  This is not
true, during WWII, when the inductee arrived at the induction station,
this is what would happen.  Depending upon the current needs (at that
time) of the different military services, they might take the first 500
and send them to the Army and the next 200 would go to the Navy and so
forth and so forth.  That is one of the main reasons for someone to
volunteer during WWII, if they wanted to go to the Navy they had to
volunteer for the Navy and pass their physical.  Dwelling a little more on
the first number of the serial number.  The number "1" did denote Regular
Army, a "2" would represent a National Guard and a "3" would represent a
non volunteer or a so called "draftee".  Now dwelling a little more on the
"prefixes" before the serial number, there were quite a few and I don't
remember them all out of my head.  RA did represent a prefix for a Regular
Army Member, NG represents a National Guard Member, ER represents an
Enlisted Reservist, AUS (abbreviated US) represents a "draftee", O denotes
an Officer, W represents a Warrant Officer and there are others.  And of
course the Air Force has AF and the Navy has N and these other services
may have others that I am not aware of at present!  OK, now getting back
to the serial number and the "second" number in the serial number.  This
is where the old Corps Areas designation comes in, The "First Corps Area"
included, for instance, Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts,
etc,. Volunteers from these states (Corps Area I) would have a serial
number starting out with a "1" (denoting volunteer or RA), the second
number of the serial number would be a "1" also denoting the 1st Corps
Area, so the serial number would be 11------.  If the person was a
"draftee", it would be 31------,  if the volunteer was a volunteer from,
say New York, which was in the 2nd Corps Area, their serial number would
be 1 (meaning volunteer) and 2 (meaning II Corps Area), hence 12------.
By the same example a "draftee" would be 32------ from New York, or any
other State in the II Corps area. The first or original serial number was
only used one time whether he started out as a "draftee" "3" or what and
followed that person during his entire life.  If he was in the Army and
went to the Navy, Air Force, Marines the same serial number followed that
person.  Later on in years after WWII, around 1964, the Military Services
started using the Social Security Account Number to identify everyone.
They still do use this system of identification.

I hope that I have not confused too many people with this long winded
detail, but I also hope that I have shed some "light" and brought back
some rememberances of things in the past!  Some "good times" and also some
"bad times" for some of us.  I am sure that some of you will have some
comments about what I have written, so go ahead and "Shoot Away", I don"t
promise that I will answer but I will probably read your comments with
interest!

Dudley Doyle
North Carolina




