From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Wed Feb 22 17:18:40 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1N0Iejb020237;
	Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:18:40 -0700
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1N0IdgB017465
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:18:39 -0700
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k1MLnJFI008010
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:49:19 -0500
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k1MLnJxb008009
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:49:19 -0500
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k1ML5bFI007886
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:05:37 -0500
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k1MNYkWq018232
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:34:46 -0700
X-Envelope-From: hornbeck@s-hornbeck.com Wed Feb 22 16:34:46 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1MNYkjb018223
	for <ROOTS-L@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:34:46 -0700
Received: from smtp100.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp100.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [216.136.174.138])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k1MNYiXh028477
	for <ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:34:44 -0700
Received: (qmail 97028 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2006 23:34:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO shirley-.s-hornbeck.com) (shirleyhornbeck@sbcglobal.net@69.106.120.124 with login)
  by smtp100.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Feb 2006 23:34:43 -0000
Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20060222153224.0441d6a0@pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:33:14 -0800
To: ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com
From: Shirley Hornbeck <hornbeck@s-hornbeck.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com
Subject: [ROOTS-L] This and That Census Tips

SOME TIPS WHEN USING CENSUS RECORDS:
Just because two families are next to each other on the census page 
doesn't mean they lived near each other.
More often than not those listed next to each other are neighbors but 
no guaranties.  The assumption is that the census taker visited every 
household in his assigned district in a systematic manner.  Not only 
will getting their names help you sort out land records but you'll 
find that they witnessed each other legal documents and that they 
married each other.   District boundaries had to be drawn 
somewhere.  There are always going to be relatively close households 
that wound up in different districts and were enumerated by different 
people on different days.

Just because two families are at opposite ends of the census doesn't 
mean they were NOT neighbors.  If the census taker started out on a 
county, beginning with his neighbor on the south, and went all over 
the county until he ended up back at his house with his neighbor on 
the east, the first and last census entries could be neighbors and 
were certainly living close together even if they weren't officially 
next door to each other.  The "neighbor" problem is twofold.  First, 
you don't know what path the census taker followed.  Second, and even 
worse, it's impossible to draw out a path through a town for a census 
taker to follow that puts everybody on that path next to each of 
their neighbors on the census.  Try it if you don't believe it.  In 
trying  it, you will gain some additional insight into the "neighbor 
problem" on census returns.  It's a problem even in a small town with 
only four blocks.  There are some assumptions, however, that seem 
relatively safe.
If you find two families you know were related and they were listed 
next to each other on the census, then they probably were neighbors. 
This assumption is warranted only because it seems improbable that 
two specific related families living across town from each other 
would end up next to each other on the census by chance.  It could 
happen but it's not likely.

If you find two families listed next to each other in different 
censuses (for instance, 1840 and 1850), then they probably were 
neighbors.  The reasoning is obvious.

More tips at my This and That web page, see my signature for url.


Shirley Hornbeck  - THIS & THAT GENEALOGY TIPS: 
<http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~hornbeck>
<http://www.genealogical.com/item_detail.asp?afid=1132&ID=9377>



