From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Wed Feb 15 16:17:24 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1FNHOjb028223;
	Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:17:24 -0700
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1FNHLBu028027
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:17:21 -0700
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k1FKmRFI020394
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:48:27 -0500
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k1FKmRrG020393
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:48:27 -0500
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k1FJJ6FI020009
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:19:06 -0500
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k1FLlnAL016635
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:47:49 -0700
X-Envelope-From: ChristieTrapp@aol.com Wed Feb 15 14:47:49 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1FLlnjb016624
	for <ROOTS-L@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:47:49 -0700
Received: from imo-d04.mx.aol.com (imo-d04.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.36])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1FLlkvB018168
	for <ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:47:46 -0700
Received: from ChristieTrapp@aol.com
	by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.3.) id e.1db.4cae4793 (16335)
	 for <ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:47:36 -0500 (EST)
From: ChristieTrapp@aol.com
Message-ID: <1db.4cae4793.3124fb78@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:47:36 EST
To: ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5300
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com
Subject: [ROOTS-L] Losing Data

My husband just had his "tower" harddrive crash BEFORE he had a chance to  
back it up.  I think I got all my stuff backed up into a CD back in  December, 
but had made some changes to a file or two for my high school reunion  mailing 
list.  I usually make a print out of this mailing list and file it  away with 
the reunion stuff when the reunion is completed.  We just had one  in 
September and was in the process of inputting address changes that came after  the 
reunion.  Needless to say, I'm not sure if I did it before I backed it  up, or 
afterwards.
 
Now his "tower" harddrive decided to take a dive in January - both of  them!  
We quickly went out and bought a Seagate 300 and he finally backed  up both 
our laptop computers.  His took very little time to do - maybe he  didn't have 
as many large files as mine, but my initial backup took almost 4  hours to 
transfer.  One of these days we're going to find some computer  geek to look at 
his two harddrives on his "tower" to see if any data can be  recovered, though 
we aren't hopeful.
 
Someone just wrote about the rest of the media that can crash and I  agree.  
Anyone of them can do it.  I just listened to a music tape of  one of my 
favorite pieces of music that I bought in China back in 1984.  A  portion of it was 
played on the local classical station and I thought about  buying it in a CD 
version.  Exploring this possibility has been hard  because it appears that 
most of the "current" versions only play one part of the  concerto and not the 
entire concerto.  I decided to play the tape last  night on my car radio and 
discovered that I had inadvertently pressed the record  button the last time I 
played it, so am missing about 10 minutes of the concerto  on side B.  Now I'm 
frantic to find a CD version of the entire piece.   Will probably have to 
return to China to get the entire concerto.  So if we  can "crash" our computers, 
we can also crash the old cassettes too.
 
As for websites - one thing I always make a practice of is to print out the  
information from the website and put those copies into my files.  I now  have 
paper copies because I have learned that websites come and websites  go.  In 
my database when I have entered this source I type in the _http://URL_ 
(http://URL)  address and then put "as of whatever the date  was I found it" following 
so that if a future researcher looks at my information  and then can't find 
the same website that they know that on that particular date  it did exist.  
That's what makes it so hard to use the Internet as a source  and then try to go 
back and repeat what you found one time way back when.
 
The only time I don't make copies of the websites for my records is when it  
is a transcript of a known printed source such as "The Register" or "The  
Mayflower Quarterly" or TAG or some vital record that I know is located at a  
local library in my area.  But if it is someone's genealogy, or anything  else, I 
take and make the time to print it off for my personal records.
 
As for the possibility of a fire or a flood?  Food, no worry -  everything is 
on the second floor.  Fire - well, if that happens, I'll  probably just quit 
doing genealogy because most of the records will probably be  destroyed, wet, 
smoke damaged, ruined and I've got too many years invested in my  family 
genealogy to make it worth my while to go back and start all over.   True, I could 
put it onto floppys as far as the computer stuff goes, but I've  also got two 
4-drawer laterals full of research, about 60 photo albums and about  15 of the 
old LDS Book of Remembrances that are all handwritten that I could  probably 
begin anew if I had to, but at this point in my life, I'm getting close  to 
retiring, I've got no children to pass it along to, and only one cousin who  is 
interested in genealogy and might want all my research.
 
So, the whole point of this tale is to say that you need to think about why  
you are doing this wonderful hobby and is it all worth it?  If the answer  is 
to pass along to your children, you are doing it for yourself to learn about  
your roots, then by all means make sure your information is secure.    For me, 
at this point, it has become a hobby and nothing more.  On my main  lines, I 
have gone back about as far as I can go.  I've found my Mayflower  ancestors 
on my mom's side.  I've followed my dad's roots back to 1650  in Sweden and 
England to about 1700.  There are a few holes left to fill,  but mostly I'm now 
working on all the collateral lines and bringing them down to  the present.  
I'm going back and documenting a lot of the names I've found  in printed 
genealogies to verify the information found to be accurate by  locating the names and 
dates in the locations where the source has said the were  and citing the VRs.
 
If I were to print out my hard drive of data I would, at a minimum be  
printing out over 60,000 pages, which equates to 120 reams of paper or 12  cases of 
paper which amounts to about $300 if each case of paper only costs  $20.  That 
would mean at least one page per name; however, I know that many  of them 
have more than one page of information either as a listing of sources or  as 
notes that I have copied, so this would add up.  How many inkjet  cartridges I 
would use to pursue this printout project, heaven only knows.   But at $50-$60 
for each set of cartridges that would probably only print a case  of paper, it 
would be a costly project.
 
At one point I used to print out my records and put them in binders.   But 4 
binders later and only about a third of the names I had at that time  
(probably less than 1,000), I gave up on that idea!
 
Printing books?  I printed out a "short one" when I went back to  Plymouth, 
MA last Sept and did my direct line only as an Anatafel and it was  almost 200 
pages.  Can you imagine if I did one of just one of my more  prolific lines as 
a descendants - with collaterals?  My mind can't fathom  that one.
 
So bottom line - everything is relative to what you want to have happen to  
your research and all the hard work you put into gathering your family  data.  
How important is it?  
 
Christie Trapp

