From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Sat Feb 11 16:57:39 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1BNvdE0021583; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:57:39 -0700 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1BNvbBg032309 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:57:37 -0700 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k1BLStFI014203 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:28:55 -0500 Received: (from roots-in@localhost) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k1BLStrE014202 for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:28:55 -0500 Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k1BLRYFI014156 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:27:34 -0500 Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k1BNu4Oq020979 for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:56:04 -0700 X-Envelope-From: Kith-n-Kin@cox.net Sat Feb 11 16:56:04 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1BNu4E0020970 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:56:04 -0700 Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (fed1rmmtao06.cox.net [68.230.241.33]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1BNu1tV031569 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:56:01 -0700 Received: from TOWER ([68.0.155.47]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060211235237.SQWH20050.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@TOWER>; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 18:52:37 -0500 From: "Kith-n-Kin" To: "'John Dickerson'" , Subject: RE: [ROOTS-L] 15th & 16th century Marriage in England Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:56:00 -0700 Message-ID: <001d01c62f66$b8f40f90$2f9b0044@TOWER> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: <000501c62f5d$03e32680$4001a8c0@dickerson> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com John Your use of "about 1564" and no exact date makes me wonder about the source of the information. Did the same source have both records? Otherwise, consider this. I have ancestors from "St. Martins in the Fields", but there are no parish records there anymore. The records were moved to St. Anne or to St. Margaret (I think). So, this many years later, records from one may be mis-identified when indexed. Another possibility. What exactly is the record? A posting of banns? A record of intent (similar to a bond) or what? If the bride came from one parish, and the groom from another, you could easily have had two very similar records. Tell us more about your records, and maybe we can give a better answer. Oh, and if you weren't royalty, or there was a lot of property involved, it is unlikely anyone would have gone to the trouble to marry twice. Pat (in Tucson) |-----Original Message----- |From: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com |[mailto:roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of John Dickerson |Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 15:47 |To: ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com |Subject: [ROOTS-L] 15th & 16th century Marriage in England | | |I hope that someone out there can tell me if it was the custom |for man and wife to be married twice in different ceromonies |to the same person, I have a ancestor that was married to his |wife at two different churches in London England about 1564. | |John in Ks | |