From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Mon Feb  6 16:52:46 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k16NqkE0030987;
	Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:52:46 -0700
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k16NqjM2027587
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:52:45 -0700
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k16LOMFI014740
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:24:22 -0500
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k16LOMGX014739
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:24:22 -0500
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k16L7CFI014648
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:07:12 -0500
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k16NZOOZ017935
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:35:24 -0700
X-Envelope-From: hornbeck@s-hornbeck.com Mon Feb  6 16:35:23 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k16NZNE0017926
	for <ROOTS-L@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:35:23 -0700
Received: from smtp018.mail.yahoo.com (smtp018.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.115])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k16NZKCB018224
	for <ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:35:21 -0700
Received: (qmail 6603 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2006 23:35:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO shirley-.s-hornbeck.com) (shirleyhornbeck@sbcglobal.net@66.122.5.229 with login)
  by smtp018.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Feb 2006 23:35:21 -0000
Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20060206152850.0420ee80@pop.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 15:33:45 -0800
To: ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com
From: Shirley Hornbeck <hornbeck@s-hornbeck.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com
Subject: [ROOTS-L] THIS AND THAT MISC GENEALOGY TIPS

WHAT'S IT ALL MEAN...LINEAL...COLLATERAL...ALLIED?
LINEAL means ascending or descending in a direct line.  Example - If your
surname/maiden name is Brown, your Brown line is your direct lineal line.
COLLATERAL means descended from the same ancestor but not in a direct line
of descent.
ALLIED families are families related usually through marriage.
SASE: Enclose a SASE (self-addressed stamped envelope) when requesting
information from ANY source, individuals, Court House, Library, etc.  You
stand a much better chance of a reply if you do.  Otherwise, your query may
go into the trash pile.
YEOMAN AND FREEMAN: In England, the terms "Yeoman" and "Freeman" mean 
the same thing.  There were roughly six social classes in early 
England:  the peers or noblemen; the gentry; knights of the shire who 
lived off the rents from their lands; lawyers, merchants, 
professional people; Yeoman farmers and then the common people.  A 
Yeoman farmer was a freeholder having quite a lot of land and 
employing others to help him farm it.  The terms in New England 
probably meant much the same thing.
BOAT OR SHIP: Boat - as used by seamen the term does not apply to a 
vessel, but to a small craft.  Boat as distinguished from the general 
term ship, is constructed of bent frames and a vessel of ship of sawn 
frames. (This is the opinion of a shipbuilder.)
Ship - Strictly a vessel, square-rigged, on all masts from three up. 
The term is used loosely and applied to quite generally to all 
vessels. A seaman speaks of his vessel as "the ship" regardless of 
rig or power.
EVIDENCE AND PROOF: All evidence is relative in its value; none that 
I know of is absolute.
There are three kinds of facts: those for which you have abundant 
proof, those which you believe to be true but for which you do not 
have overwhelming evidence, and assumptions which you use as leads, 
hoping to find more evidence or a strong reason to abandon it. The 
problem comes when
two pieces of evidence do not agree completely, or when we are not 
absolutely certain that the evidence we have applies.  Here are some 
guiding principles:
1. The nearer the recording is to the event, the more likely it is to 
be correct. For example, a birth certificate is probably more 
accurate than a tombstone.
2. Legal documents tend to be more accurate than family notes or 
traditions.  They were probably prepared by a third party and people 
tend to be more careful with legal matters.
3. The census is not a legal document.  It is only as accurate as the 
census taker and the person giving the information.  Names may be 
spelled incorrectly.  Included may be nieces or nephews with the same 
last name being mistaken for children, and children may not be listed 
if  they were away at the time of the census.
1. With Family Bibles, ask the following:
  a. What is the date of the publishing edition on page 2?  Is it 
such that the family purchased it early in their marriage, or did an 
enterprising child fill it in later?
b. Is the handwriting the same for all entries (someone "caught up" 
the record at one sitting)?  Even if the same person wrote it all, if 
it was done over a period of years, their handwriting will vary, 
certainly the pen and ink will.
2. With birth certificates:
a. The date and place is probably correct, though in very olden days, 
the doctor or midwife may have done the paperwork later and there may 
be a day or two difference.
b. The mother's name is probably correct though the spelling may be 
off.  The doctor knew who his patient was.
c. Likewise the spelling of the child's name can vary.  Be especially 
careful of transcribed copies of lists made before the days of birth 
certificates.
d. The biological father is probably correct but not as sure. The 
doctor can only record what the mother told him.
3. With tombstones:
a. Don't be surprised if dates vary from other records.  The stone 
mason may have made a mistake, but more often the family member 
providing the information was doing so from memory.
b. If the data doesn't fit, look for another explanation.
4. Wills:
a. A good source of information but don't draw too much from them.
b. If older children are missing from the list, don't be 
alarmed.  Instead turn to land deeds and see if the father may have 
helped the older son buy land at an earlier date, or even have deeded 
some of his own land to him.
c. Very rarely a person may have mentioned a brother, sister, niece, 
or nephew by name but without identification as to relationship.
5. The more facts we have about a person, the more he/she becomes a 
unique individual.  Nothing is absolute and you may have to judge 
between conflicting facts.
FINDING MAIDEN NAMES:
In the lower left-hand corner of most deeds, you will find signatures 
of two to four witnesses.  The first one is always from the husband's 
side.  The next one is always from the wife's side.  This is to 
protect her 1/3 dower right under the law.  Nothing you will ever use 
will give greater clues to maiden names than witnesses to old deeds!
Also in the 1800's and before, it was traditional when the daughter 
got married, as part of her dowry, the father either covered the loan 
or carried the note for his son-in-law.  If you know the husband's 
name but not the wife's maiden name and you can find out to whom they 
were making their mortgage payments, about  70% of the time it was her father.
LEGAL TRIVIA
When land was sold, the spouse had to be listed in the land 
record.  Land records should be searched after a death as often a 
list of heirs will be shown during partition of the estate and even 
sometimes a map.
If there is a will, it is probated by an Executor - if there is no 
will, the estate is cared for by an Administrator appointed by the court.
"IN RE" concerning adoptions means "in regards to" something.  You 
can often find adoptions listed in record books where divorce and 
probate records are filed.  Instead of putting adoptions in under the 
letter "A" they may place them under "I" for "in re".  Under this 
category you will find petitions to change name, petition to adopt, etc.


Shirley Hornbeck  http://www.s-hornbeck.com
THIS & THAT GENEALOGY TIPS: <http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~hornbeck>
  <http://www.genealogical.com/item_detail.asp?afid=1132&ID=9377>



