From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Mon Aug 21 21:12:41 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k7M3Cfjb031733; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:12:41 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7M3CVW9025321 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:12:31 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k7M0WTFI010228 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:32:29 -0400 Received: (from roots-in@localhost) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k7M0WTSH010227 for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:32:29 -0400 Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k7LNkwFI010071 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:46:58 -0400 Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k7M2Qmal031242 for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:26:48 -0600 X-Envelope-From: sdm.prowett@gmail.com Mon Aug 21 20:26:48 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k7M2Qmjb031233 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:26:48 -0600 Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.204]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7M2QhEr002628 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:26:44 -0600 Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i1so829943nzh for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:26:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:references:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=UlXPGSEMgobOcVPakiv/kpXv+fT78EgKK9e2yPFj42l9WYBvMfvi2hNF5yfag4uvekvYrd9VoOMJxK0/VShRGSxM1/shuzjKqGwga8Fp/RsdotJwFqrbYzbz0g1TAF3g0kqWdJkThgWdt/ABicd2Qg/+0qcKHvmOlqdH9ZyMPu4= Received: by 10.64.148.8 with SMTP id v8mr7785284qbd; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Yoda ( [64.146.135.196]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e18sm7818qba.2006.08.21.19.26.44; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <003f01c6c592$6948e5c0$6601a8c0@Yoda> From: "Sondra Prowett" To: "Kith-n-Kin" , References: <001101c6c57b$b8e91490$6601a8c0@TOWER> Subject: Re: [ROOTS-L] Uploading trees to Ancestry & WorldConnect Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:26:41 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2905 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com It'd be nice if you could make a source repository confidential :) S o n d r a ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kith-n-Kin" To: Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 4:44 PM Subject: RE: [ROOTS-L] Uploading trees to Ancestry & WorldConnect > Margaret & all who are following my progress with new and improved > uploaded trees, > > OUCH! and Mea Culpa to all my relatives, living and dead, who may be > offended by that! > > | > | Just think about all those people in the past that shared > |on the FTM > |cds their "beginning" research and now have no way to take back the > |mistakes. Yes we all make mistakes, but hopefully we make > |fewer as we gain > |experience. > | > > Update on the progress of the NOTES. > > I heard from Ancestry Support that they are aware that the Notes are not > appearing on the Personal Trees, > and have alerted the programmers (who are all busy trying to develop the > advanced search option, I > suppose) to fix it. > > No joy on the deleting of the *bad* tree (see above "ouch"). But since it > has the names of obviously > living people, maybe I can get Genealogy.com to delete it. Or, fix it. > > On the other hand, I just ran into another problem that I'd like to share > on the uploading of my "tree". > Has to do with "repositories" > > I have at least one instance (I hope only one) where the "repository" of a > Bible is a cousin, whom I named > in my repository for that source. Oops! Her name and city popped right up > on the sources for the notes on > the tree I uploaded. I immediately took down the tree, went to TMG (The > Master Genealogist) and deleted > that repository link. > > But, darn it, I may need that information when I have another case of > "CRS" (or some other senility), so > now I have to go back to TMG and re-connect the source to the repository. > And then, remember next time I > put up an update. > > Be nice if we could choose not to include repositories. After all, who > cares which file cabinet in my > office has the file on Aunt Mabel? Except me. And Aunt Mabel. > > I'm beginning to understand why some people put up no sources! > > Pat (in Tucson) > > >