From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Tue Aug  8 08:23:00 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k78EN0jb018585;
	Tue, 8 Aug 2006 08:23:00 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k78EMvHw007891
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 08:22:57 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k78BhhFI015999
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:43:43 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k78BhhG9015998
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:43:43 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k789A6FI015665
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:10:06 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k78Bn95t018593
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:49:09 -0600
X-Envelope-From: juanita2@cox.net Tue Aug  8 05:49:08 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k78Bn8jb018582
	for <ROOTS-M@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:49:08 -0600
Received: from centrmmtao02.cox.net (centrmmtao02.cox.net [70.168.83.82])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k78Bn4fE000626
	for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:49:05 -0600
Received: from DH433L51 ([24.255.150.191]) by centrmmtao02.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP
          id <20060808114901.KDMV22014.centrmmtao02.cox.net@DH433L51>
          for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:49:01 -0400
From: "juanita" <juanita2@cox.net>
To: ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 06:49:09 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <44D833E5.14719.E2416DB@localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <65d66f240608072057x37bfa9bbh79e0180338cf85fb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <44D79D24.5010703@comcast.net>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-description: Mail message body
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Subject: [ROOTS-L] Re: lost family in the 1880 census
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com

Many of us apparently have had similar occasions in locating our 
families on the census records.  I'm glad we have the census indexes  
available though even if we have to turn into being detectives in 
locating a name.  

I couldn't find a family by the name of Willard on the 1880 census no 
matter how hard I looked.  I knew where they lived but even reading 
the actual census handwriting myself I missed them.  After the FHL 
posted the census online I decided to try searching by a son's 
surname since I knew his mother had remarried to a Willard and that 
he was still living with her.  Sure enough I did find the family.  
It'd been indexed as Wiltuso.  The original handwriting on the census 
was difficult to read and I could understand why it was misspelled in 
the index.

I don't know if there are still hard bound copies of the census 
indexes any longer or not.   I used them a lot before I had a 
computer or could get the census microfilm at our local library. This 
was 25-30 yrs. ago. I can't recall who the authors were now but I 
know there was more than one and they didn't all agree on name 
spellings.  Perhaps these books are still in some libraries and might 
be a good place to check if someone is having difficulty finding a 
name.

We really have to be creative or hopefully have an unusual given name 
to search with sometimes.

juanita

> I had a similar situation. In searching for my mother's family in the
> 1930 census I had used every spelling for Garrett and soundex. Nothing
> came up where it should be. Then I entered the name Lenore with
> qualifying infomation and there they were. Garrett had been transcrib
> ed as Gavveat. I believe it to be an error in transcribing as the
> families in this area had been there for many, many years. There were
> few unknowns in the area. The use of rare first names can aid in
> finding that elusive family.
> 
> Marilyne


