From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Wed Aug 2 10:50:36 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k72Goajb011398; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:50:36 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k72GoXsc024939 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:50:33 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k72EBfFI004254 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:11:41 -0400 Received: (from roots-in@localhost) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k72EBf9x004253 for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:11:41 -0400 Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k72DUSFI004111 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:30:28 -0400 Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k72G9Bmp024790 for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:09:11 -0600 X-Envelope-From: JYoung6180@aol.com Wed Aug 2 10:09:11 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k72G9Bjb024779 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:09:11 -0600 Received: from imo-d23.mx.aol.com (imo-d23.mx.aol.com [205.188.139.137]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k72G8jlE024532 for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:08:45 -0600 Received: from JYoung6180@aol.com by imo-d23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id e.535.52dbeb7 (42808) for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:08:22 -0400 (EDT) From: JYoung6180@aol.com Message-ID: <535.52dbeb7.320227f6@aol.com> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:08:22 EDT To: ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5031 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Subject: [ROOTS-L] Re: Re: ROOTS-L Digest V06 #330 -- search results hits From: "patt" coolpatt@velocity.net Joan,I am just returning to the list,but I assume you are the person in charge. I,too,have listed dates such as 1823 and received a lot of hits from 1960's,none even close to what I wanted. coolpatt ---- Hi, Patt- I'm not really in charge of anything -- but if you will be more specific as to exactly what you are searching for and where I'll be happy to see if I can help sort it all out. Joan PS: If you are referring to Ancestry.com EXACT MATCH searches--they are aware of the bug and working to fix it.