From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Tue Apr 25 22:15:08 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k3Q4F8jb020263; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:15:08 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3Q4F6xH002937 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:15:06 -0600 Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k3Q1g3FI019986 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:42:03 -0400 Received: (from roots-in@localhost) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k3Q1g3fZ019985 for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:42:03 -0400 Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41]) by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k3PKJWFI019385 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:19:32 -0400 Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k3PMqMfZ016998 for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:52:22 -0600 X-Envelope-From: neal4@comcast.net Tue Apr 25 16:52:22 2006 Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34]) by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k3PMqMjb016989 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:52:22 -0600 Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net ([63.240.77.81]) by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3PMqIaf018683 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:52:18 -0600 Received: from wd080a (unknown[71.194.147.11](misconfigured sender)) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <2006042522512301100r9hl7e>; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:51:23 +0000 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.20060425175046.009e9100@mail.comcast.net> X-Sender: neal4@mail.comcast.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:50:46 -0500 To: ROOTS-L@rootsweb.com From: Neal Underwood Cc: "lynne227" In-Reply-To: <200604252016.k3PKGeqF022150@lists5.rootsweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34 Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Subject: [ROOTS-L] Removing vintage photos that are pasted to old black scrapbook pages There are two versions of "Un-du". One is "Un-du Adhesive Remover" and the other is "Un-du Photo". I have used both and both work great. Un-du Adhesive Remover is intended to remove those nasty, impossible-to-remove labels that manufacturers and stores put on their products. It works quickly, cleanly and where everything else I tried failed. Un-du Photo is specificially targeted to remove adhesive residue from photographs. I have used it to remove cellophane tape residue from the face of photographs. It removed the residue completely, dried quickly, didn't appear to leave any spotting or scent, and didn't appear to damage or alter the photos in any way. I don't know what the chemical difference is - or if there actually is a difference. The Adhesive Remover is available at hardware stores and Wal-Mart. The Photo version is sold at scrapbooking stores. Like everything else now, both are also sold online. I haven't tried to remove black scrapbook paper and I would suspect that the result would depend upon the type of paste or glue that was originally used. We would be very interested in hearing how it works for that application. Neal