From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Sun Apr 16 18:28:33 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k3H0SXjb030750;
	Sun, 16 Apr 2006 18:28:33 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3H0SVh1008901
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 18:28:31 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k3GLu3FI026008
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:56:03 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k3GLu3N5026007
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:56:03 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k3GJR1FI023689
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:27:01 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k3GLxJDW017208
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:59:19 -0600
X-Envelope-From: Kith-n-Kin@cox.net Sun Apr 16 15:59:19 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k3GLxJjb017199
	for <ROOTS-M@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:59:19 -0600
Received: from fed1rmmtao08.cox.net (fed1rmmtao08.cox.net [68.230.241.31])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3GLxHJc022240
	for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:59:17 -0600
Received: from TOWER ([68.0.155.47]) by fed1rmmtao08.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP
          id <20060416215913.FGGT20694.fed1rmmtao08.cox.net@TOWER>;
          Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:59:13 -0400
From: "Kith-n-Kin" <Kith-n-Kin@cox.net>
To: "'MScheffler'" <mscheffl@twcny.rr.com>, <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:59:07 -0700
Message-ID: <000501c661a0$fc398ed0$6601a8c0@TOWER>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626
In-Reply-To: <014801c66182$f9cf6840$6601a8c0@m1070n>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
Importance: Normal
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by admin.rootsweb.com id k3GLxJjb017199
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com
Subject: [ROOTS-L] Re: Software Poll

I can't speak about Roots Magic, it has a good reputation, but I haven't ever used it. 

I have used Family Tree Maker, and The Master Genealogist. 

I don't have issues with the reports, as long as I can get "what I put in" to "come out".  I say this
because I use the "report" as a basis for word-crafting a narrative that suits me. I have yet to see a
database software that will appeal that much to my "creative" side.

I do have issues with "how" the data is maintained in the database, and for this I give TMG full marks!
Again, I haven't seen RM, so it may do the type of thing, but FTM doesn't/didn't. 

For example, in TMG, you can enter a census citation and "link" it to everyone in the database who is
mentioned in the citation. So, you don't have to repeat the same information ten, twelve, fifteen times
(some of those folks had really big families, didn't they?). Of course, when the kin all lived within a
square mile, there could be cousins, aunts, uncles. .. .   I'm sure you get the picture.

You have hundreds of "types" of information to choose from, and if you don't find what you like, you can
make up your own.  So, if you don't like "Military - begin" and "Military - end" you can add "Military
Service" and put as much information as you like in a paragraph.

Because so many of us were concerned about implying (to the untrained eye) that we "knew" who someone's
parent was, we asked for and got a "father-can" and "mother-can" for people we present as a candidate for
that position.  And, we can put in many "candidates", each with his/her pedigree.

The other issue, and a serious one for some of us, is the ability to put in our sources for information --
as many as needed, and in great detail. Great for developing footnotes and bibliographies.

As Margaret said, TMG has a "steep" learning curve -- if you let it.  I liken it to my classes in Mandarin
Chinese.  If you want a "basic" social ability, it doesn't take too long. If you want to fully understand
and speak the language, it takes a lifetime. (yes, I opted for "please, thank you, where are you from, how
are you. . . ")  So, you can begin in TMG pretty easily, it has a vital e-list and forum, and no one
criticizes your ignorance (she says from experience <G>)

I also support Margaret's suggestion for downloading and trying out a couple of programs. I know RM and
TMG have trials, I bet Legacy, FTM, and so on do to.

Cost may be a factor, but Roots Magic costs $30, the "silver edition" of The Master Genealogist costs $40,
I would guess Legacy and FTM are in that same neighborhood. 

By the way, Carol, most of us aren't "pros" -- we are just "practicing genealogists" -- and if we practice
long enough, maybe we'll get it right!

Good luck,

Pat (in Tucson)

