From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Thu Apr 13 15:41:23 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k3DLfNjb011159;
	Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:41:23 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3DLfLEw013621
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:41:21 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k3DJ93FI028312
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:09:03 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id k3DJ93jw028311
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:09:03 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.27.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id k3DI6sFI028140
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:06:54 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id k3DKd2G3010978
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:39:02 -0600
X-Envelope-From: Kith-n-Kin@cox.net Thu Apr 13 14:39:02 2006
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.65.34])
	by admin.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k3DKd1jb010967
	for <ROOTS-M@lists5.rootsweb.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:39:02 -0600
Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net (fed1rmmtao03.cox.net [68.230.241.36])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3DKcvwa018022
	for <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:38:58 -0600
Received: from TOWER ([68.0.155.47]) by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP
          id <20060413203849.KTXZ18351.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@TOWER>;
          Thu, 13 Apr 2006 16:38:49 -0400
From: "Kith-n-Kin" <Kith-n-Kin@cox.net>
To: "'juanita'" <juanita2@cox.net>, <ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com>
Subject: RE: [ROOTS-L] Re:  Social Security Numbers
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 13:36:33 -0700
Message-ID: <035901c65f39$f75c3e30$6601a8c0@TOWER>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
In-Reply-To: <443E507B.20925.4B64B37@localhost>
Importance: Normal
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 192.168.65.34
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com

I have noticed that several of my relatives, during the depression, wound up with cards from California,
Idaho, and so on. Further investigation shows that they were CCC or WPA, and off fixing forests and such.

Pat (in Tucson)



|-----Original Message-----
|From: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com 
|[mailto:roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of juanita
|Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:22
|To: ROOTS-M@rootsweb.com
|Subject: [ROOTS-L] Re: Social Security Numbers
|
|
|That's interesting.  I wonder if the original social security 
|application wouldn't have shown his "true" residence.  That should 
|prove to Social Security Administration where he actually lived and 
|the date when he registered.
|
|juanita
|
|> I was curious one day and was looking up my deceased 
|husband's Social 
|> Security information.  I was astonished to find that in the internet 
|> records, he was listed as having received his SS card in California. 
|> He had always lived in Washington, so searched some more and found 
|> that evidently at one time, California was running short of numbers. 
|> Some Washington state numbers were transferred to California, 
|> therefore he is listed as having received his SS card in California. 
|> Puzzle solved.  The correspondance I received stated that 
|the state in 
|> which  the card was issued cannot be changed without valid proof.
|> The only proof I would have would be that he was a lifelong resident
|> of Walla Walla County.  If one state borrowed numbers from another
|> state/states, you may run into this problem also.  Best wishes with
|> your searches!
|> 
|> Mary
|> 
|
|
|
|


