From roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com Fri Jul  1 22:36:00 2005
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.16.34])
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j624a0B1026622;
	Fri, 1 Jul 2005 22:36:00 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l.rootsweb.com [66.43.16.22])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j624a0vt013339
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 22:36:00 -0600
Received: from roots-l.rootsweb.com (roots-l [127.0.0.1])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j623DCei006234
	for <roots-approved@rootsweb.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 23:13:12 -0400
Received: (from roots-in@localhost)
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id j623DC1K006233
	for roots-approved@rootsweb.com; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 23:13:12 -0400
Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [66.43.18.41])
	by roots-l.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j622P8ei006059
	for <roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 22:25:08 -0400
Received: (from slist@localhost)
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id j623lk63031343
	for roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 21:47:46 -0600
X-Envelope-From: gordon_watts@telus.net Fri Jul  1 21:47:44 2005
Received: from mail.rootsweb.com (mail.rootsweb.com [192.168.16.34])
	by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j623liB1031195;
	Fri, 1 Jul 2005 21:47:44 -0600
Received: from priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net (outbound05.telus.net [199.185.220.224])
	by mail.rootsweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j623lgvt029219;
	Fri, 1 Jul 2005 21:47:43 -0600
Received: from gordon3 ([64.180.230.49]) by priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with SMTP
          id <20050702034737.JTRJ9854.priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net@gordon3>;
          Fri, 1 Jul 2005 21:47:37 -0600
Message-ID: <229401c57eb9$8e56cd30$6c7ba8c0@gordon3>
From: "Gordon A. Watts" <gordon_watts@telus.net>
To: "Canada Census Campaign" <CANADA-CENSUS-CAMPAIGN-L@rootsweb.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:53:00 -0700
Organization: Canada Census Campaign
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.38
Sender: roots-in@roots-l.rootsweb.com
Subject: [ROOTS-L] Post 1901 Census - Victoria Times Colonist article

Greetings All.

I copy here for your information an article by Dave Obee that appeared
on page A10 of the Victoria Times Colonist newspaper of 30 June 2005.
It is copied here with permission.

Dave Obee is a genealogist, lecturer, writer and editor of the Victoria
Times Colonist.  During the course of our campaign he has written and
published a number of articles supportive of what we have finally
achieved.

Happy Hunting

Gordon A. Watts  gordon_watts@telus.net
Co-chair Canada Census Committee
Port Coquitlam, BC

http://www.globalgenealogy.com/Census
en francais  http://www.globalgenealogy.com/Census/Index_f.htm

Permission to forward without notice is granted

===============================

Census data will help us appreciate our history.

Canada Day is a holiday based on history, a celebration of our heritage
as Canadians. And this year, the federal government has given us a
special gift - it has unlocked the door to documents that will help us
discover more about our past.

The good news came on Tuesday morning, when MPs gave unanimous consent
to a change in Canada's statistics law. That sounds, well, boring, so
it's no real surprise that the controversial same-sex marriage
legislation that was passed a few hours later took all the attention.

But the amendment to the Statistics Act matters, too, especially to the
tens of thousands of Canadians who have been lobbying MPs for the change
for several years. They include genealogists and historians, not the
usual suspects when it comes to fighting for a change in a law.

The amendment allows census returns to be opened for research 92 years
after they are compiled. That means we will get immediate access to the
national census taken in the spring of 1911, and all of the information
it contains about people, relationships, occupations and more.

And we'll be able to see the 1916 census of the Prairies in 2008, the
1921 national census in 2013, and another census every five years after
that.

This is great news for anyone with an interest in the country's history.
So if you hear a lot of cheering in your neighbourhood this weekend, it
might not be Canada Day celebrants, it might just be historians getting
out of hand.

A census represents a view of the country and its people - all of its
people - at one point in time. As a source of historical information, it
can't be matched.

Despite the obvious value of opening these old records, there was a real
risk that they could have been locked away forever, which would have
imposed severe limits on our understanding of our collective past.

The problem was that when the census was taken, there was a promise that
the information would be kept confidential. That promise was interpreted
in some federal government circles as being a promise for all time -
even long after the people who provided the information were dead.

And so, with the records hidden from view, researchers started writing
letters, signing petitions and filing access-to-information requests in
an effort to have them opened.

The census returns up to 1901 had all been released, after all, without
causing a commotion. Still, the government refused to let anyone see the
census returns from 1906 and later.

I must admit to a personal bias here. I was one of a dozen people from
across Canada who got together to sue the government for the release of
the 1906 census, which covered just the high-growth (at that time,
anyway) Prairie provinces.

We were pressing forward, confident of victory, and ready to argue our
case in court when the government suddenly decided, in January 2003,
that it could open up the 1906 census after all.

But it still drew the line at the 1911 one. It's taken the firm resolve
of some keen supporters inside government - Ontario Liberal Senator
Lorna Milne tops the list - along with private individuals to ensure
that we would finally get access to the old documents.

Milne first raised the issue about access to historic census returns in
1998, after Statistics Canada said it had concerns about the legality of
releasing them.

StatsCan has an understandable concern, because much of its work would
become much more difficult if Canadians stopped trusting it. And going
back on a promise of confidentiality doesn't do much to build trust.

That said, there surely must be a time limit to any promise to keep
things quiet. I'd guess that King Tutankhamen didn't want the world to
know all his secrets, but that hasn't stopped anyone from putting his
assets on display.

And I'm sure that my great-grandfather William Montgomery wouldn't have
wanted his neighbours, back in 1911, to know how much money he made. But
old Will has been at rest, as they say, in Vancouver for more than six
decades. I'm not convinced that he cares about his old secrets any more.

The amendment that was passed by MPs this week eliminates any need for
further discussion about historic census records for years to come. That
is a tremendous boost for anyone doing historical research, for whatever
reason, and it's fitting that the change came so close to Canada Day.

Friday's holiday is our chance to remember the founding of our nation,
and to look back at how Canada has evolved through the years. All the
flag-waving and face-painting is nice, but there would be no reason for
Canada Day without Canadian history.

Our history matters. It's refreshing to know that our MPs understand
that.

dobee@tc.canwest.com


