Filename: learning ROOTS-L can be of great help to you in your research, but misunderstanding the functions and communication styles of this group can irritate very large numbers of people. Please read this article before contributing items to the group. This file is reposted periodically; it is also available from the archives of this group as: GENEALOG file: LEARNING Contributing items to this discussion group is is a form of electronic publication: within a few hours of submission, your item will have been distributed to thousands of systems throughout the world and perhaps 10,000 people will have read it. About 1400 people, those who subscribe to ROOTS-L, will have received your item in their personal mailbox; an unknown number wiil have read it on the thousands of systems which receive the soc.roots newsgroup. In addition, your contribution is added to the archives of this group, publicly accessible files which can be searched and read by anyone who wishes to do so. Someday your descendents may read what you had to say. Please Do: * Read contributions for a while before trying to compose and send your own. * Obtain a personal e-mail address and learn how to use e-mail before contributing an item. People who want to respond to your article will typically contact you directly through e-mail, unless they believe that their response is of such general interest that it should be posted to the group. * End each article you send with information on how to contact you, by e-mail *and* by regular mail. (Some people who read this group may not have e-mail access. Also, one address may change, but the other may still work.) This "signature" should be brief and simple; avoid lists of surnames, because they give false "hits" whenever someone searches the archives of articles on ROOTS-L. * If you wish to respond to a posted item, it is often more appropriate to e-mail your response directly to the poster. (It is certainly far more economical to send an item to one person than to 10,000! Many participants in this forum do not see the costs of transmission, except as taxpayers; but those that particpate through a commercial service may be charged for every character of data that is sent to them.) If you think your response will be of interest to many others, then send it to the group, but provide enough context that your contribution makes sense to those who may not have seen the item you are responding to. * Use the subject line to describe your topic briefly and accurately. (Many people depend on this to determine whether or not to read an item.) * Discover how to preview an item before posting it. (This depends on the software on your system, so you will have to ask someone there or read the documentation for the software you use.) Previewing your posting gives you a final opportunity to notice errors and either fix them or cancel the posting. * Be very cautious about using shortcuts such as "reply" (for ROOTS-L subscribers). The software may not do what you expect. Such shortcuts may result in: incorrect subject lines; full repetition of the entire article to which you are responding; items distributed to everyone on the group instead of the one person you intended to reach. * If your topic is a query of the type that will fit into the Roots Surname List format or the Roots Location List format, it should be added to these ROOTS-L databases; this is probably far more effective than sending the query to the discussion group. For information on how to submit information to the Roots Surname List, send e-mail to LISTSERV@mail.eworld.com with the message GET FAMILY README. For information about the Roots Location List, contact Suzanne Badenhop, AHCSBB@UKCC.UKY.EDU. * Remember that the topic of discussion in this group is genealogy. This can touch many other areas of discourse, but if your post is unrelated to family history, it does not belong here. * Consider how many, many items are distributed through this group. Good articles are more likely to inspire useful responses than poor ones are. People who read soc.roots/ROOTS-L have many other demands on their time and attention; most are involved as hobbyists. There are some very helpful people here and several volunteer time and effort to managing the group and maintaining its archives, but no one is paid to do this. No one has any *obligation* to read your post or send you information. The style of your post is an important factor in whether they will do so or not. Suggestions on electronic style: * Content: - Be courteous. - Be complete. Provide enough context. If you're asking about a research puzzle, explain what you have tried already. If your topic is software, explain what kind of system you are using. Give your research families some context: dates, places, etc. - If your post is a query, consider *not* posting: instead submit it to the Roots Surname List database, a set of files in the ROOTS-L archives. For information send mail to karen@rand.org. There is also a Locations database, to help you find others searching in the same place and time frame. - Be resourceful. Don't ask questions that you could easily resolve yourself by opening a standard reference book, such as a dictionary or atlas. - Use a specific and accurate subject line. - Be brief, and clear, and interesting, if possible. - Remember that what appears on the first screen of your article probably determines whether someone reads the second screen -- or skips to the next article. - Electronic text does not convey the nuances which demonstrate a humorous intention; other typographical techniques may be used: a sideways "smiley" face :-) or a . - It is not useful to ask the group how your local system and its software works. This is something you have to investigate locally. Ask your local system manager or user consultants; or read the manuals. * Form: - Lines of text should be shorter than 80 characters. (Longer lines can result in truncation, or very awkward line breaks: difficult or impossible to read.) - Text paragraphs should be singlespaced and separated by a blank line. - Text should consist of mixed case characters. All caps is difficult to read and is perceived as an electronic form of shouting. All caps *is* preferred for surnames -- this makes it very easy to scan for surnames of interest. Word emphasis is normally shown by enclosing the word in special characters, such as * shown above or _ shown below. - Never repeat the _entire_ post to which you are responding. A few well-chosen lines should suffice. Multiple *levels* of requoting from previous articles are hard to read and probably indicate a discussion which should be moved into e-mail or dropped entirely. - Avoid sending a sequence of similarly worded items at the same time. (Your audience will get bored and start skipping your articles instead of reading them.) - Always reread your article before sending it. Ask yourself: if you weren't the author, what would you think of the article? Would you read the entire item? Would you respond? - If you realize, after posting, that your post has errors or omissions severe enough and important enough to require a correction, redo the entire post. (If you try to send just the corrections, it will make little sense; there is no easy way for readers to connect the two articles.) - If your e-mail to someone bounces, do *not* post the entire bounced message to the group. Just post a brief note, asking that person to contact you, if possible, with a good address. /end of message/